The Broken On-Ramp · Week 2 of 4
The ABCs of Movement
We measure almost everything about kids' readiness to learn. So why do we still have so few benchmarks for movement?
By Lincoln Gunn · April 23, 2026 · 6 min read
By the time a child reaches kindergarten, we usually know a lot about her early development. But ask what physical milestones a five-year-old should be hitting, and most parents and educators will draw a blank.
Last week, I wrote about cost as one reason the on-ramp into girls' sports is broken. This week's barrier is different: physical readiness.
Why movement matters
The early years between ages 2 and 8 are a critical window for building fundamental motor skills. Those skills are the building blocks of physical literacy, the same way letter recognition is for reading.
Girls feel this gap differently
Physical confidence and emotional confidence are closely linked. When girls feel behind or unsure of themselves physically, sport can quickly start to feel like a place of judgment instead of play.
The system that should be catching this
In the U.S., school PE has been steadily weakened. Only 43% of schools require PE by twelfth grade — down from 97% in sixth grade. A New York audit found a median annual PE budget of just $764 across 10 districts.
What other countries do differently
Denmark integrates 45 minutes of daily movement into the school day, with play-based programs and explicit guidance to avoid early competition. Canada's PLAYfun framework assesses children across 18 fundamental movement tasks.
Building better physical benchmarks
The broken on-ramp to girls' sports is not only a cost problem. It is also a readiness problem.
View the full article with research links and citations at ludologicsports.com/blog/abcs-of-movement.